CDNA
Price
$9.77
Change
+$0.50 (+5.39%)
Updated
May 3, 1:53 PM EST
6 days until earnings call
CERS
Price
$1.67
Change
-$0.09 (-5.11%)
Updated
May 3, 1:53 PM EST
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions CDNA vs CERS

Header iconCDNA vs CERS Comparison
Open Charts CDNA vs CERSBanner chart's image
CareDx
Price$9.77
Change+$0.50 (+5.39%)
Volume$467
CapitalizationN/A
Cerus
Price$1.67
Change-$0.09 (-5.11%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CDNA vs CERS Comparison Chart

Loading...

CDNADaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
CERSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
CDNA vs. CERS commentary
May 03, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNA is a Buy and CERS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 03, 2024
Stock price -- (CDNA: $9.27 vs. CERS: $1.76)
Brand notoriety: CDNA and CERS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNA: 75% vs. CERS: 53%
Market capitalization -- CDNA: $548.33M vs. CERS: $342.62M
CDNA [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $548.33M. CERS’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $342.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $7.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCERS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CERS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNA is a better buy in the long-term than CERS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CERS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CERS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CERS is a better buy in the short-term than CDNA.

Price Growth

CDNA (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +22.62% price change this week, while CERS (@Medical Specialties) price change was +3.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

CERS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+2.00% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CDNA with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CERS with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNA($548M) has a higher market cap than CERS($343M). CERS YTD gains are higher at: -18.519 vs. CDNA (-22.750). CERS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -26.34M vs. CDNA (-84.92M). CDNA has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. CERS (65.9M). CDNA has less debt than CERS: CDNA (34.2M) vs CERS (96M). CDNA has higher revenues than CERS: CDNA (280M) vs CERS (156M).
CDNACERSCDNA / CERS
Capitalization548M343M160%
EBITDA-84.92M-26.34M322%
Gain YTD-22.750-18.519123%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue280M156M179%
Total Cash235M65.9M357%
Total Debt34.2M96M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNA vs CERS: Fundamental Ratings
CDNA
CERS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1520
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CERS's Valuation (51) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNA (100). This means that CERS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CDNA (100). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

CERS's SMR Rating (97) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CDNA (97). This means that CERS’s stock grew similarly to CDNA’s over the last 12 months.

CDNA's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as CERS (61). This means that CDNA’s stock grew similarly to CERS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNA's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CERS (100). This means that CDNA’s stock grew significantly faster than CERS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNACERS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDNADaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
CERSDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAMGX14.350.28
+1.99%
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth A
GIRGX19.550.17
+0.88%
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity ESG Inv
NMGRX16.100.14
+0.88%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
FLCOX16.930.09
+0.53%
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index
KTRAX9.510.03
+0.32%
DWS Global Income Builder A

CDNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNA has been loosely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNA jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNA
1D Price
Change %
CDNA100%
+0.98%
VCYT - CDNA
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
TWST - CDNA
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
NTRA - CDNA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
CERS - CDNA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
QTRX - CDNA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
More

CERS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CERS has been loosely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CERS jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CERS
1D Price
Change %
CERS100%
+2.33%
VCYT - CERS
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
TWST - CERS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
KIDS - CERS
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
CDNA - CERS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
TFX - CERS
42%
Loosely correlated
-6.06%
More