CDNA
Price
$23.14
Change
+$0.18 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
548.33M
26 days until earnings call
ELUT
Price
$3.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
76.46M
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CDNA vs ELUT

Header iconCDNA vs ELUT Comparison
Open Charts CDNA vs ELUTBanner chart's image
CareDx
Price$23.14
Change+$0.18 (+0.78%)
Volume$100
Capitalization548.33M
Elutia
Price$3.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization76.46M
CDNA vs ELUT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNA vs. ELUT commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNA is a Buy and ELUT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNA: $22.98 vs. ELUT: $3.10)
Brand notoriety: CDNA and ELUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNA: 82% vs. ELUT: 19%
Market capitalization -- CDNA: $548.33M vs. ELUT: $76.46M
CDNA [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $548.33M. ELUT’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $76.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileELUT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ELUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDNA is a better buy in the long-term than ELUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELUT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ELUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNA is a better buy in the short-term than ELUT.

Price Growth

CDNA (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -1.92% price change this week, while ELUT (@Medical Specialties) price change was -5.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNA is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

ELUT is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+0.50% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNA($548M) has a higher market cap than ELUT($76.5M). CDNA YTD gains are higher at: 7.333 vs. ELUT (-17.112). ELUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -31.68M vs. CDNA (-84.92M). CDNA has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. ELUT (19.3M). ELUT has less debt than CDNA: ELUT (24M) vs CDNA (34.2M). CDNA has higher revenues than ELUT: CDNA (280M) vs ELUT (24.7M).
CDNAELUTCDNA / ELUT
Capitalization548M76.5M716%
EBITDA-84.92M-31.68M268%
Gain YTD7.333-17.112-43%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue280M24.7M1,134%
Total Cash235M19.3M1,218%
Total Debt34.2M24M143%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNA: Fundamental Ratings
CDNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAELUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ELUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKPSX58.61N/A
N/A
ProFunds Banks UltraSector Svc
MSFRX19.38N/A
N/A
MFS Total Return A
GCASX44.65N/A
N/A
Gabelli Small Cap Growth A
MSQLX10.20N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq L
GVIZX12.17N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Index Inv

CDNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNA has been loosely correlated with MTD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNA jumps, then MTD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNA
1D Price
Change %
CDNA100%
+1.86%
MTD - CDNA
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
VCYT - CDNA
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.83%
BLFS - CDNA
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
ILMN - CDNA
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
RVTY - CDNA
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
More

ELUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ELUT and RBOT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ELUT and RBOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ELUT
1D Price
Change %
ELUT100%
+3.68%
RBOT - ELUT
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.06%
MHUA - ELUT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
TWST - ELUT
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
RPID - ELUT
23%
Poorly correlated
+18.63%
CDNA - ELUT
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More