Ad is loading...
Analysis and predictions CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$40.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$92.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 29, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CDOFX (264M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.69) vs CDOFX (1.29). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (11 years) vs NAESX (63 years). CDOFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NAESX (14.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.72 vs. CDOFX (-3.08). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.10 vs. CDOFX (2.17).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.17 | 671% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 63 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.576 | 5.425 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.69 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.08 | 1.72 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.83 | 5.32 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.17 | 32.10 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.60 | 88.01 | 43% |