Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CDOFX vs NAESX
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CDOFX vs NAESX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend
Price$47.38
Change+$0.51 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.3M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.80
Change+$1.09 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
CDOFX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CDOFX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDOFX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. CDOFX (304M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CDOFX: NAESX (1.28) vs CDOFX (1.18). CDOFX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CDOFX (13 years) vs NAESX (65 years). CDOFX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). CDOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). CDOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: CDOFX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.66 vs. CDOFX (4.40). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.55 vs. CDOFX (45.59).
| CDOFX | NAESX | CDOFX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.17 | 582% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.439 | -0.229 | 629% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 10.66 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.49 | 35.57 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.59 | 66.55 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.09 | 104.81 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers