CDTAF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
CINGF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

CDTAF vs CINGF

Header iconCDTAF vs CINGF Comparison
Open Charts CDTAF vs CINGFBanner chart's image
INFINITII AI
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$648.75K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CDTAF vs CINGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
CDTAF vs. CINGF commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDTAF is a Hold and CINGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (CDTAF: $0.03 vs. CINGF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CDTAF and CINGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDTAF: 177% vs. CINGF: 60%
Market capitalization -- CDTAF: $6.68M vs. CINGF: $2.1M
CDTAF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.68M. CINGF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDTAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCINGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDTAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the long-term than CDTAF.

Price Growth

CDTAF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -19.53% price change this week, while CINGF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDTAF($6.68M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 16.279 vs. CDTAF (12.011). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. CDTAF (-2.62M). CDTAF has more cash in the bank: 688K vs. CINGF (173K). CDTAF has higher revenues than CINGF: CDTAF (1.97M) vs CINGF (214K).
CDTAFCINGFCDTAF / CINGF
Capitalization6.68M2.1M318%
EBITDA-2.62M318K-824%
Gain YTD12.01116.27974%
P/E RatioN/A175.44-
Revenue1.97M214K919%
Total Cash688K173K398%
Total Debt986KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDTAF vs CINGF: Fundamental Ratings
CDTAF
CINGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10066
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDTAF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (82). This means that CDTAF’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CDTAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (100). This means that CDTAF’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDTAF (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CDTAF (60). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDTAF (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla

CDTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDTAF and BLND have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDTAF and BLND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDTAF
1D Price
Change %
CDTAF100%
+4.97%
BLND - CDTAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
CCOEY - CDTAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
CINGF - CDTAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
CMPD - CDTAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.16%
CCOEF - CDTAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-5.66%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.36%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPD - CINGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.16%
More