It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CECO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEPAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CECO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CECO (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +15.71% price change this week, while EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.98%.
CECO is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2024.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
CECO | EPAC | CECO / EPAC | |
Capitalization | 802M | 1.93B | 42% |
EBITDA | 47.4M | 128M | 37% |
Gain YTD | 48.915 | 54.181 | 90% |
P/E Ratio | 62.14 | 26.10 | 238% |
Revenue | 545M | 597M | 91% |
Total Cash | 54.8M | 154M | 36% |
Total Debt | 155M | 245M | 63% |
CECO | EPAC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAC's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CECO (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to CECO’s over the last 12 months.
CECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as EPAC (16) in the null industry. This means that CECO’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CECO (82) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CECO’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CECO (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to CECO’s over the last 12 months.
CECO's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (46) in the null industry. This means that CECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
CECO | EPAC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago74% | 3 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VITPX | 102.25 | 0.70 | +0.69% |
Vanguard Instl Ttl Stk Mkt Idx InstlPls | |||
MSFBX | 36.82 | 0.23 | +0.63% |
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise A | |||
GMOUX | 24.40 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
GMO International Equity I | |||
TNVDX | 10.97 | 0.01 | +0.12% |
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I | |||
PSVIX | 16.95 | N/A | N/A |
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value Inst |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CECO has been loosely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CECO jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CECO | 100% | +0.77% | ||
FELE - CECO | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
FSS - CECO | 47% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
EPAC - CECO | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
ETN - CECO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
XYL - CECO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EPAC | 100% | +0.78% | ||
FSS - EPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
NPO - EPAC | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.32% | ||
FELE - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
KMT - EPAC | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.02% | ||
FLS - EPAC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More |