Advertisement
EPAC vs NPO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a StrongBuy and NPO is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EPAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NPO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while NPO (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -4.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -4.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
NPO is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-4.82% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| EPAC | NPO | EPAC / NPO | |
| Capitalization | 1.78B | 6.89B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 150M | 198M | 76% |
| Gain YTD | -9.127 | 52.598 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.74 | 159.03 | 12% |
| Revenue | 634M | 1.17B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 116M | 79.2M | 146% |
| Total Debt | 185M | 618M | 30% |
EPAC | NPO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAC's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPO (92) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPO’s over the last 12 months.
NPO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (71) in the null industry. This means that NPO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
EPAC's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NPO (89) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NPO’s over the last 12 months.
NPO's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (59) in the null industry. This means that NPO’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
NPO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAC (68) in the null industry. This means that NPO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAC’s over the last 12 months.
| EPAC | NPO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMLL | 21.28 | 0.15 | +0.72% |
| Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | |||
| MAGA | 56.49 | 0.14 | +0.25% |
| Point Bridge America First ETF | |||
| EVSB | 50.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF | |||
| AMDL | 74.53 | N/A | N/A |
| GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | |||
| QCJA | 23.29 | -0.09 | -0.38% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jan | |||
EPAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAC | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| LECO - EPAC | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| RBC - EPAC | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| ATMU - EPAC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| NPO - EPAC | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| SNA - EPAC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||