Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEFIX vs RNWAX
CEFIX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts CEFIX vs RNWAX
Calvert Emerging Markets Advancement I
Price$13.62
Change+$0.09 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.7M
American Funds New World R1
Price$84.32
Change+$0.86 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.99B
CEFIX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFIX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFIX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 69B vs. CEFIX (109M). CEFIX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: CEFIX (1.58) vs RNWAX (0.00). CEFIX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: CEFIX (6 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CEFIX (1.17). CEFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEFIX: RNWAX (250) vs CEFIX (1000000). CEFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.53 vs. RNWAX (10.05). CEFIX return over 5 years is better than : 56.76 vs. RNWAX (30.06).
| CEFIX | RNWAX | CEFIX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.66 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.66 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.244 | 14.519 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 69B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.53 | 10.05 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.91 | 32.62 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.76 | 30.06 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement