Ad is loading...
CEFS vs GLO
CEFS vs GLO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEFS vs. GLO commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEFS is a Hold and GLO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CEFS has more net assets: 254M vs. GLO (239M). CEFS has a higher annual dividend yield than GLO: CEFS (1.043) vs GLO (-2.659). CEFS was incepted earlier than GLO: CEFS (8 years) vs GLO (19 years). GLO (3.01) has a lower expense ratio than CEFS (5.81). GLO has a higher turnover CEFS (29.00) vs CEFS (29.00).
| CEFS | GLO | CEFS / GLO | |
| Gain YTD | 1.043 | -2.659 | -39% |
| Net Assets | 254M | 239M | 106% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 5.81 | 3.01 | 193% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 85.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 8.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CEFS | GLO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EADIX | 16.92 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Global Equity Income A | |||
| DQEIX | 12.71 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - I | |||
| TEDRX | 29.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R | |||
| IPFCX | 28.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Poplar Forest Cornerstone Investor | |||
| FGDMX | 105.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA | |||
GLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLO and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLO and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLO | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| LRCX - GLO | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
| AIR - GLO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
| DKNG - GLO | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
| FERG - GLO | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.18% | ||
| BA - GLO | 3% Poorly correlated | +3.99% | ||
More | ||||