Ad is loading...
CELV
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.19 (+47.50%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
RGF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.01 (-3.70%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

CELV vs RGF

Header iconCELV vs RGF Comparison
Open Charts CELV vs RGFBanner chart's image
Preferred Commerce
Price$0.59
Change+$0.19 (+47.50%)
Volume$24.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Real Good Food Company (The)
Price$0.26
Change-$0.01 (-3.70%)
Volume$212.52K
CapitalizationN/A
CELV vs RGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELV vs. RGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CELV is a Hold and RGF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CELV: $0.59 vs. RGF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: CELV and RGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELV: 208% vs. RGF: 36%
Market capitalization -- CELV: $10.56M vs. RGF: $7.02M
CELV [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $10.56M. RGF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $7.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CELV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CELV is a better buy in the long-term than RGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CELV (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +75.94% price change this week, while RGF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -20.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGF is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CELV($10.6M) has a higher market cap than RGF($7.02M). CELV YTD gains are higher at: 1348.171 vs. RGF (-83.046). CELV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 69.5K vs. RGF (-32.82M). RGF has more cash in the bank: 78K vs. CELV (2.7K). CELV has less debt than RGF: CELV (4.77M) vs RGF (144M). RGF has higher revenues than CELV: RGF (156M) vs CELV (614K).
CELVRGFCELV / RGF
Capitalization10.6M7.02M151%
EBITDA69.5K-32.82M-0%
Gain YTD1348.171-83.046-1,623%
P/E RatioN/A6.71-
Revenue614K156M0%
Total Cash2.7K78K3%
Total Debt4.77M144M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELV: Fundamental Ratings
CELV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTMGX15.73-0.07
-0.44%
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Admiral
DMCVX34.34-0.21
-0.61%
BNY Mellon Opportunistic Midcap Value A
LGVAX108.21-0.75
-0.69%
ClearBridge Value A
GEMRX13.38-0.10
-0.74%
abrdn Emerging Markets R
WAYEX17.61-0.17
-0.96%
Waycross Managed Risk Equity Fund

CELV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELV and BYCBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELV and BYCBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELV
1D Price
Change %
CELV100%
+48.44%
BYCBF - CELV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - CELV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRCNF - CELV
14%
Poorly correlated
+7.31%
RGF - CELV
12%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
WEST - CELV
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
More

RGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGF and LW have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGF
1D Price
Change %
RGF100%
-4.20%
LW - RGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
UTZ - RGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
ATPC - RGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
PSYCF - RGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.63%
FAMI - RGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
More