Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMDX vs RNWBX
CEMDX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$14.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.04
Change+$0.21 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.13B
CEMDX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. CEMDX (1.3B). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMDX (2.71) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMDX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CEMDX (1.47). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX (10.48) and RNWBX (10.23) have marching annual gain over last year. CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.38 vs. RNWBX (24.46).
| CEMDX | RNWBX | CEMDX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 1.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.355 | 15.622 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 70.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.13 | 2,119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 10.23 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.05 | 38.39 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.38 | 24.46 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.00 | 60.70 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement