Ad is loading...
CEMDX vs RNWHX
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWHX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$12.52
Change-$0.23 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.57
Change-$1.82 (-2.24%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 64B vs. CEMDX (952M). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMDX (3.81) vs RNWHX (1.44). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMDX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.23 vs. RNWHX (11.83). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. RNWHX (15.41).
| CEMDX | RNWHX | CEMDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.762 | 9.868 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 952M | 64B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 1.44 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.23 | 11.83 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.57 | 0.39 | 6,342% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | 15.41 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.19 | N/A | - |