Ad is loading...
CEMDX vs RNWHX
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMDX vs RNWHX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
Price$12.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets990.93M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.43
Change-$0.43 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.63B
CEMDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMDX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. CEMDX (991M). CEMDX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMDX (3.81) vs RNWHX (1.44). CEMDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMDX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CEMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMDX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMDX (1000). CEMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. RNWHX (4.96). CEMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.74 vs. RNWHX (17.41).
| CEMDX | RNWHX | CEMDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.486 | 4.486 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 991M | 63.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 1.44 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 4.96 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.85 | 6.00 | 397% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.74 | 17.41 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | N/A | - |