Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CEMFX vs RNWHX
CEMFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWHX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$12.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CEMFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a Sell and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 61.7B vs. CEMFX (930M). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMFX (3.92) vs RNWHX (1.44). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMFX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RNWHX (11.50). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.26 vs. RNWHX (17.73).
| CEMFX | RNWHX | CEMFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 7.843 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 61.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.92 | 1.44 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 11.50 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.91 | -11.39 | -192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.26 | 17.73 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.83 | N/A | - |