Ad is loading...
CEMFX vs RNWHX
CEMFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMFX vs RNWHX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div I
Price$12.91
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets990.93M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.43
Change-$0.43 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.63B
CEMFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMFX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. CEMFX (991M). CEMFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMFX (3.92) vs RNWHX (1.44). CEMFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMFX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CEMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMFX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMFX (1000000). CEMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. RNWHX (4.96). CEMFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.53 vs. RNWHX (17.41).
| CEMFX | RNWHX | CEMFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.542 | 4.486 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 991M | 63.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.92 | 1.44 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 4.96 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.74 | 6.00 | 412% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.53 | 17.41 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers