Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWBX
CEMGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$13.84
Change+$0.11 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.12B
CEMGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. CEMGX (1.18B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMGX (2.14) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.21 vs. RNWBX (10.50). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 75.01 vs. RNWBX (27.64).
| CEMGX | RNWBX | CEMGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.67 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.67 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.481 | 15.935 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 70.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 0.13 | 1,671% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.21 | 10.50 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.28 | 37.23 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.01 | 27.64 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.12 | 63.65 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement