Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWBX
CEMGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$13.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
American Funds New World R2
Price$82.86
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.6B
CEMGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 68.6B vs. CEMGX (1.14B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMGX (2.47) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. RNWBX (8.37). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 73.48 vs. RNWBX (30.13).
| CEMGX | RNWBX | CEMGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.67 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.67 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.886 | 12.658 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 68.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 0.13 | 1,832% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 8.37 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.52 | 33.95 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.48 | 30.13 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.56 | 56.81 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers