Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CEMGX vs RNWBX
CEMGX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWBX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$14.10
Change-$0.07 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
CEMGX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. CEMGX (1.33B). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: CEMGX (2.14) vs RNWBX (0.13). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWBX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.03 vs. RNWBX (14.84). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 75.78 vs. RNWBX (24.82).
| CEMGX | RNWBX | CEMGX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.67 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 1.67 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.612 | 16.479 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 70.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 0.13 | 1,671% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.03 | 14.84 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.75 | 37.52 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.78 | 24.82 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.10 | 66.54 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement