Ad is loading...
CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWHX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$12.53
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.52M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$79.43
Change-$0.43 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.98B
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 64B vs. CEMGX (992M). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMGX (3.38) vs RNWHX (1.44). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMGX (12 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RNWHX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. CEMGX (5.69). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 39.66 vs. RNWHX (18.10).
| CEMGX | RNWHX | CEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.533 | 5.104 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 992M | 64B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.38 | 1.44 | 235% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 7.02 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 5.06 | 388% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.66 | 18.10 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers