Ad is loading...
CEMGX vs RNWHX
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CEMGX vs RNWHX
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div C
Price$12.24
Change-$0.23 (-1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets969.29M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$76.05
Change-$1.84 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
CEMGX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CEMGX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEMGX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. CEMGX (969M). CEMGX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CEMGX (2.60) vs RNWHX (1.12). CEMGX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CEMGX (13 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CEMGX (2.22) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CEMGX: RNWHX (250) vs CEMGX (1000). CEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.28 vs. RNWHX (-1.62). CEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 82.65 vs. RNWHX (50.02).
| CEMGX | RNWHX | CEMGX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.72 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.72 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.039 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 969M | 62.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 1.12 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.28 | -1.62 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.33 | 0.02 | 85,922% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.65 | 50.02 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers