CERGF
Price
$2.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MCLE
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

CERGF vs MCLE

Header iconCERGF vs MCLE Comparison
Open Charts CERGF vs MCLEBanner chart's image
Ceres Global Ag
Price$2.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$72.2K
CapitalizationN/A
MEDICALE
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.68K
CapitalizationN/A
CERGF vs MCLE Comparison Chart
Loading...
CERGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCLE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CERGF vs. MCLE commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CERGF is a Sell and MCLE is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CERGF: $2.14 vs. MCLE: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: CERGF and MCLE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CERGF: 679% vs. MCLE: 385%
Market capitalization -- CERGF: $55.14M vs. MCLE: $7.4M
CERGF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $55.14M. MCLE’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $7.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CERGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCLE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CERGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCLE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CERGF is a better buy in the long-term than MCLE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CERGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCLE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CERGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCLE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CERGF is a better buy in the short-term than MCLE.

Price Growth

CERGF (@Food Distributors) experienced а -3.60% price change this week, while MCLE (@Food Distributors) price change was +5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.63% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CERGF($55.1M) has a higher market cap than MCLE($7.4M). MCLE YTD gains are higher at: 73.333 vs. CERGF (30.599). MCLE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -37.12K vs. CERGF (-13.91M). CERGF has more cash in the bank: 7.12M vs. MCLE (159). CERGF has higher revenues than MCLE: CERGF (1.11B) vs MCLE (0).
CERGFMCLECERGF / MCLE
Capitalization55.1M7.4M745%
EBITDA-13.91M-37.12K37,484%
Gain YTD30.59973.33342%
P/E Ratio3.05N/A-
Revenue1.11B0-
Total Cash7.12M1594,478,616%
Total Debt66.9MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CERGF: Fundamental Ratings
CERGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
85
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CERGFMCLE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CERGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCLE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YOLO2.370.03
+1.28%
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
GMOM28.920.30
+1.05%
Cambria Global Momentum ETF
HEGD22.670.09
+0.40%
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
EGLD.X33.530823-0.420570
-1.24%
MultiversX cryptocurrency
ILV.X39.729280-0.756744
-1.87%
Illuvium cryptocurrency

CERGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CERGF and MCSHF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CERGF and MCSHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CERGF
1D Price
Change %
CERGF100%
N/A
MCSHF - CERGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRONY - CERGF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
MCLE - CERGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTTWF - CERGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KARNF - CERGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCLE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCLE and JRONY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCLE and JRONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCLE
1D Price
Change %
MCLE100%
N/A
JRONY - MCLE
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
KARNF - MCLE
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CERGF - MCLE
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSHXF - MCLE
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCSHF - MCLE
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More