CFB
Price
$17.66
Change
-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Updated
Nov 12, 03:16 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$29.54
Change
-$0.11 (-0.37%)
Updated
Nov 12, 03:20 PM (EDT)
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFB vs FFBC

Header iconCFB vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts CFB vs FFBCBanner chart's image
CrossFirst Bankshares
Price$17.66
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
First Financial Ban
Price$29.54
Change-$0.11 (-0.37%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
CFB vs FFBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFB vs. FFBC commentary
Nov 12, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFB is a Sell and FFBC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 12, 2024
Stock price -- (CFB: $17.68 vs. FFBC: $29.65)
Brand notoriety: CFB and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFB: 111% vs. FFBC: 87%
Market capitalization -- CFB: $684.05M vs. FFBC: $2.08B
CFB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $684.05M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFB and FFBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than CFB.

Price Growth

CFB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +14.29% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +4.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+4.78% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than CFB($684M). CFB has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: CFB (10.12) vs FFBC (8.15). CFB YTD gains are higher at: 30.191 vs. FFBC (28.661). CFB has less debt than FFBC: CFB (86.8M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than CFB: FFBC (840M) vs CFB (245M).
CFBFFBCCFB / FFBC
Capitalization684M2.08B33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.19128.661105%
P/E Ratio10.128.15124%
Revenue245M840M29%
Total CashN/A213M-
Total Debt86.8M1.28B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFBFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZVGIX50.331.20
+2.44%
Zevenbergen Genea Institutional
PLKGX87.420.59
+0.68%
Putnam Small Cap Growth R6
GGOIX23.96N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Instl
MNMCX14.95N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
JUEZX26.73-0.02
-0.07%
JPMorgan US Equity R2

CFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFB has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFB jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFB
1D Price
Change %
CFB100%
+3.51%
BUSE - CFB
87%
Closely correlated
+3.59%
UBSI - CFB
85%
Closely correlated
+3.39%
FFBC - CFB
85%
Closely correlated
+3.93%
WSFS - CFB
84%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
NWBI - CFB
84%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+3.93%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+3.39%
UCB - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
FRME - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+3.56%
BUSE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+3.59%
More