CFFN
Price
$5.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
797.05M
82 days until earnings call
GSBC
Price
$58.99
Change
-$1.00 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
622.17M
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFFN vs GSBC

Header iconCFFN vs GSBC Comparison
Open Charts CFFN vs GSBCBanner chart's image
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$5.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.47K
Capitalization797.05M
Great Southern Ban
Price$58.99
Change-$1.00 (-1.67%)
Volume$156
Capitalization622.17M
CFFN vs GSBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFN vs. GSBC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a StrongBuy and GSBC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFN: $5.86 vs. GSBC: $58.99)
Brand notoriety: CFFN and GSBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFN: 84% vs. GSBC: 82%
Market capitalization -- CFFN: $797.05M vs. GSBC: $622.17M
CFFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $797.05M. GSBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $622.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBC is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GSBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFN is a better buy in the short-term than GSBC.

Price Growth

CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.64% price change this week, while GSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

GSBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFN($797M) has a higher market cap than GSBC($622M). CFFN has higher P/E ratio than GSBC: CFFN (10.40) vs GSBC (9.45). CFFN YTD gains are higher at: -0.846 vs. GSBC (-1.189). GSBC has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. CFFN (32.6M). GSBC has less debt than CFFN: GSBC (102M) vs CFFN (2.37B). GSBC has higher revenues than CFFN: GSBC (223M) vs CFFN (-41.29M).
CFFNGSBCCFFN / GSBC
Capitalization797M622M128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.846-1.18971%
P/E Ratio10.409.45110%
Revenue-41.29M223M-19%
Total Cash32.6M103M32%
Total Debt2.37B102M2,326%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFN vs GSBC: Fundamental Ratings
CFFN
GSBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
2621
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8930
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFN's Valuation (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GSBC (60). This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to GSBC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (100). This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's SMR Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (26). This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (58). This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFFN (89). This means that GSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFNGSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBPIX46.69N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Instl
SCVFX31.37N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Value C
TVOIX39.39N/A
N/A
Touchstone Small Cap Value Institutional
RYATX73.70N/A
N/A
Rydex NASDAQ-100® A
PSECX17.91N/A
N/A
1789 Growth and Income C

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
N/A
UBSI - CFFN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
NWBI - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
SFNC - CFFN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
GSBC - CFFN
79%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
EBC - CFFN
79%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
More

GSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBC has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBC jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBC
1D Price
Change %
GSBC100%
-1.67%
THFF - GSBC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
NWBI - GSBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
CTBI - GSBC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
WSFS - GSBC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
UBSI - GSBC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More