CFFN
Price
$5.78
Change
+$0.09 (+1.58%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
797.05M
47 days until earnings call
GSBC
Price
$56.65
Change
+$0.89 (+1.60%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
622.17M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFN vs GSBC

Header iconCFFN vs GSBC Comparison
Open Charts CFFN vs GSBCBanner chart's image
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$5.78
Change+$0.09 (+1.58%)
Volume$10.23K
Capitalization797.05M
Great Southern Ban
Price$56.65
Change+$0.89 (+1.60%)
Volume$200
Capitalization622.17M
CFFN vs GSBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFN vs. GSBC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a Hold and GSBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFN: $5.68 vs. GSBC: $55.76)
Brand notoriety: CFFN and GSBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFN: 97% vs. GSBC: 119%
Market capitalization -- CFFN: $797.05M vs. GSBC: $622.17M
CFFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $797.05M. GSBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $622.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GSBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBC is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFN is a better buy in the short-term than GSBC.

Price Growth

CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while GSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

GSBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFN($797M) has a higher market cap than GSBC($622M). CFFN has higher P/E ratio than GSBC: CFFN (10.40) vs GSBC (9.45). CFFN YTD gains are higher at: -1.084 vs. GSBC (-5.933). GSBC has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. CFFN (32.6M). GSBC has less debt than CFFN: GSBC (102M) vs CFFN (2.37B). GSBC has higher revenues than CFFN: GSBC (223M) vs CFFN (-41.29M).
CFFNGSBCCFFN / GSBC
Capitalization797M622M128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.084-5.93318%
P/E Ratio10.409.45110%
Revenue-41.29M223M-19%
Total Cash32.6M103M32%
Total Debt2.37B102M2,326%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFN vs GSBC: Fundamental Ratings
CFFN
GSBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6575
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFN's Valuation (29) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GSBC (56). This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to GSBC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFFN (100). This means that GSBC’s stock grew significantly faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (11). This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (57). This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFFN (90). This means that GSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFNGSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SAPYX35.48N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Appreciation I
SGICX16.75N/A
N/A
SGI US Large Cap Equity C
TEGCX15.17N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
LVFLX13.76N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R6
NREEX13.91N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Real Estate E

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
-0.18%
BY - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
PPBI - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
UVSP - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
GSBC - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
TRMK - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More

GSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBC has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBC jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBC
1D Price
Change %
GSBC100%
-0.16%
CTBI - GSBC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
TCBK - GSBC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
WSFS - GSBC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FMBH - GSBC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
HOPE - GSBC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More