CFFS
Price
$11.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
GLST
Price
$11.99
Change
+$0.66 (+5.83%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CFFS vs GLST

Header iconCFFS vs GLST Comparison
Open Charts CFFS vs GLSTBanner chart's image
CF Acquisition
Price$11.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Volume$751
CapitalizationN/A
Global Star Acquisition
Price$11.99
Change+$0.66 (+5.83%)
Volume$495
CapitalizationN/A
CFFS vs GLST Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFS vs. GLST commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFS is a Buy and GLST is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CFFS: $11.33 vs. GLST: $11.99)
Brand notoriety: CFFS and GLST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFS: 2% vs. GLST: 11%
Market capitalization -- CFFS: $112.98M vs. GLST: $86.34M
CFFS [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $112.98M. GLST’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $86.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLST is a better buy in the long-term than CFFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLST’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GLST’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLST is a better buy in the short-term than CFFS.

Price Growth

CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while GLST (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +4.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

GLST is expected to report earnings on Dec 07, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.83% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFS($113M) has a higher market cap than GLST($86.3M). GLST has higher P/E ratio than CFFS: GLST (107.20) vs CFFS (78.50). GLST YTD gains are higher at: 13.113 vs. CFFS (4.472). CFFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.97M vs. GLST (-2.13M). GLST has more cash in the bank: 1.51M vs. CFFS (25K). GLST has less debt than CFFS: GLST (1.59M) vs CFFS (8.46M). CFFS (0) and GLST (0) have equivalent revenues.
CFFSGLSTCFFS / GLST
Capitalization113M86.3M131%
EBITDA5.97M-2.13M-281%
Gain YTD4.47213.11334%
P/E Ratio78.50107.2073%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25K1.51M2%
Total Debt8.46M1.59M532%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFSGLST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WINAX9.09N/A
N/A
Wilmington International A
JEPAX14.69N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income A
CBACX13.16-0.22
-1.64%
AB Global Risk Allocation C
FERAX10.45-0.30
-2.79%
First Eagle Global Real Assets A
MSPIX63.93-1.93
-2.93%
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class I

CFFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFS has been closely correlated with GLLIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFS jumps, then GLLIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFS
1D Price
Change %
CFFS100%
N/A
GLLIU - CFFS
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
YOTA - CFFS
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HAIA - CFFS
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TGAA - CFFS
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEEP - CFFS
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
More

GLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLST has been loosely correlated with LATGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLST jumps, then LATGU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLST
1D Price
Change %
GLST100%
+5.83%
LATGU - GLST
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
PORT - GLST
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSSA - GLST
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWUPU - GLST
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFFS - GLST
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More