CFFS vs LION
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFS is a StrongBuy and LION is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CFFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFFS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LION’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CFFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- LION’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.25% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CFFS | LION | CFFS / LION | |
| Capitalization | 113M | 101M | 112% |
| EBITDA | 5.97M | -4.18M | -143% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -3.684 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 78.50 | 22.27 | 352% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 25K | 490K | 5% |
| Total Debt | 8.46M | N/A | - |
LION | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CFFS | LION | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 14% | 3 days ago 39% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 21% | 3 days ago 32% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 23% | 3 days ago 24% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 42% | N/A |
CFFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFS has been loosely correlated with YOTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFFS jumps, then YOTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFFS | 100% | N/A | ||
| YOTA - CFFS | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BEEP - CFFS | 33% Poorly correlated | +5.40% | ||
| MSSA - CFFS | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AFAR - CFFS | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PWUP - CFFS | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.43% | ||
More | ||||
LION and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LION and HUDAU have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LION and HUDAU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LION | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LION | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| HUDAU - LION | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HUDA - LION | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CFFS - LION | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| YOTAU - LION | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WINVU - LION | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
More | ||||