CFFS vs MSSA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFS is a Buy and MSSA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSSA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CFFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MSSA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSSA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CFFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
- MSSA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while MSSA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
MSSA is expected to report earnings on May 10, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.83% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CFFS | MSSA | CFFS / MSSA | |
| Capitalization | 113M | 71.2M | 159% |
| EBITDA | 5.97M | -598.33K | -998% |
| Gain YTD | 4.472 | 7.221 | 62% |
| P/E Ratio | 78.50 | 29.24 | 268% |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 25K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.46M | 2.13M | 398% |
| CFFS | MSSA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 6% | 1 day ago 15% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 11% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 16% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 1 day ago 1% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | N/A |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 38% | 10 days ago 11% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 28% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| USAGX | 19.74 | N/A | N/A |
| Victory Precious Metals and Minerals | |||
| BPGSX | 11.18 | -0.26 | -2.27% |
| Boston Partners Global Sustainablty Ins | |||
| ASERX | 112.22 | -3.76 | -3.24% |
| American Century Select R | |||
| KLCKX | 13.29 | -0.50 | -3.63% |
| Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap R | |||
| RPFRX | 42.51 | -1.87 | -4.21% |
| Davis Real Estate A | |||
CFFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFS has been closely correlated with GLLIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFS jumps, then GLLIU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFFS | 100% | N/A | ||
| GLLIU - CFFS | 66% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| YOTA - CFFS | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HAIA - CFFS | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TGAA - CFFS | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BEEP - CFFS | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||
MSSA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSSA has been loosely correlated with TETEU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSSA jumps, then TETEU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MSSA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSSA | 100% | N/A | ||
| TETEU - MSSA | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BRKH - MSSA | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| DPCSU - MSSA | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GLST - MSSA | 33% Loosely correlated | +5.83% | ||
| CFFS - MSSA | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||