It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWUP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWUP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while PWUP (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.
CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.
PWUP is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
CFFS | PWUP | CFFS / PWUP | |
Capitalization | 113M | 99M | 114% |
EBITDA | 5.97M | 4.47M | 134% |
Gain YTD | 4.472 | 5.601 | 80% |
P/E Ratio | 78.50 | 48.04 | 163% |
Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 25K | 0 | - |
Total Debt | 8.46M | 12.4K | 68,242% |
CFFS | PWUP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago6% | 3 days ago31% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago11% | 3 days ago7% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago16% | 4 days ago25% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago22% | 3 days ago30% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago24% | 3 days ago1% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago38% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago33% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% | 3 days ago8% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWUP has been loosely correlated with CSLMU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWUP jumps, then CSLMU could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWUP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PWUP | 100% | +0.61% | ||
CSLMU - PWUP | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
BEEP - PWUP | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
WELNF - PWUP | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
ALSAU - PWUP | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CFFS - PWUP | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |