CFFS
Price
$11.28
Change
-$0.05 (-0.44%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
112.98M
PWUP
Price
$11.80
Change
+$0.28 (+2.43%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
99.04M
Ad is loading...

CFFS vs PWUP

Header iconCFFS vs PWUP Comparison
Open Charts CFFS vs PWUPBanner chart's image
CF Acquisition
Price$11.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.44%)
Volume$12.84K
Capitalization112.98M
PowerUp Acquisition
Price$11.80
Change+$0.28 (+2.43%)
Volume$3.44K
Capitalization99.04M
CFFS vs PWUP Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWUP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFS vs. PWUP commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFS is a StrongBuy and PWUP is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFS: $11.28 vs. PWUP: $11.80)
Brand notoriety: CFFS and PWUP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFS: 98% vs. PWUP: 173%
Market capitalization -- CFFS: $112.98M vs. PWUP: $99.04M
CFFS [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $112.98M. PWUP’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $99.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePWUP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PWUP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWUP is a better buy in the long-term than CFFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWUP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PWUP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFS is a better buy in the short-term than PWUP.

Price Growth

CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PWUP (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

PWUP is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.47% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFS($113M) has a higher market cap than PWUP($99M). CFFS has higher P/E ratio than PWUP: CFFS (78.50) vs PWUP (48.04). PWUP YTD gains are higher at: 2.609 vs. CFFS (0.000). CFFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.97M vs. PWUP (4.47M). CFFS has more cash in the bank: 25K vs. PWUP (0). PWUP has less debt than CFFS: PWUP (12.4K) vs CFFS (8.46M). CFFS (0) and PWUP (0) have equivalent revenues.
CFFSPWUPCFFS / PWUP
Capitalization113M99M114%
EBITDA5.97M4.47M134%
Gain YTD0.0002.609-
P/E Ratio78.5048.04163%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25K0-
Total Debt8.46M12.4K68,242%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFSPWUP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
11%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
1%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWUP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CREEX9.960.14
+1.43%
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst
ATHDX30.320.40
+1.34%
American Century Heritage R6
GCGIX34.53N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Instl
HBFBX11.94N/A
N/A
Hennessy Balanced Investor
LSVQX19.00N/A
N/A
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional

PWUP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWUP has been loosely correlated with CSLUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PWUP jumps, then CSLUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWUP
1D Price
Change %
PWUP100%
+2.43%
CSLUF - PWUP
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEEP - PWUP
33%
Loosely correlated
+5.40%
WELNF - PWUP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFFS - PWUP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EONR - PWUP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More