CFFS
Price
$11.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
TGAA
Price
$11.37
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

CFFS vs TGAA

Header iconCFFS vs TGAA Comparison
Open Charts CFFS vs TGAABanner chart's image
CF Acquisition
Price$11.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Volume$751
CapitalizationN/A
Target Global Acquisition I
Price$11.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$16.62K
CapitalizationN/A
CFFS vs TGAA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFS vs. TGAA commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFS is a Hold and TGAA is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CFFS: $11.33 vs. TGAA: $11.37)
Brand notoriety: CFFS and TGAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFS: 2% vs. TGAA: 81%
Market capitalization -- CFFS: $112.98M vs. TGAA: $110.7M
CFFS [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $112.98M. TGAA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $110.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGAA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGAA is a better buy in the long-term than CFFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGAA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TGAA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFS is a better buy in the short-term than TGAA.

Price Growth

CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while TGAA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

TGAA is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.30% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFS($113M) and TGAA($111M) have the same market capitalization . CFFS has higher P/E ratio than TGAA: CFFS (78.50) vs TGAA (44.76). CFFS YTD gains are higher at: 4.472 vs. TGAA (2.989). CFFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.97M vs. TGAA (-1.39M). TGAA has more cash in the bank: 69.3K vs. CFFS (25K). TGAA has less debt than CFFS: TGAA (1.31M) vs CFFS (8.46M). CFFS (0) and TGAA (0) have equivalent revenues.
CFFSTGAACFFS / TGAA
Capitalization113M111M102%
EBITDA5.97M-1.39M-429%
Gain YTD4.4722.989150%
P/E Ratio78.5044.76175%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25K69.3K36%
Total Debt8.46M1.31M646%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFSTGAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSIQX14.31N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq I
MGINX10.32-0.02
-0.19%
DWS Global Macro Inst
PRCEX28.82-0.07
-0.24%
Principal Real Estate Securities C
TSONX13.25-0.05
-0.38%
Nuveen International Res Eq R6
SPMCX7.96-0.15
-1.85%
Saratoga Mid Capitalization C

CFFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFS has been closely correlated with GLLIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFS jumps, then GLLIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFS
1D Price
Change %
CFFS100%
N/A
GLLIU - CFFS
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
YOTA - CFFS
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HAIA - CFFS
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TGAA - CFFS
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEEP - CFFS
33%
Poorly correlated
+6.00%
More

TGAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGAA has been loosely correlated with IVCA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGAA jumps, then IVCA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGAA
1D Price
Change %
TGAA100%
N/A
IVCA - TGAA
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IVCAU - TGAA
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CITEU - TGAA
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APXI - TGAA
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALSA - TGAA
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More