CFFS
Price
$11.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
YOTA
Price
$11.27
Change
+$0.08 (+0.71%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

CFFS vs YOTA

Header iconCFFS vs YOTA Comparison
Open Charts CFFS vs YOTABanner chart's image
CF Acquisition
Price$11.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
Volume$751
CapitalizationN/A
Yotta Acquisition
Price$11.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.66K
CapitalizationN/A
CFFS vs YOTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YOTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFS vs. YOTA commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFS is a Hold and YOTA is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CFFS: $11.33 vs. YOTA: $11.27)
Brand notoriety: CFFS and YOTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFS: 2% vs. YOTA: 107%
Market capitalization -- CFFS: $112.98M vs. YOTA: $42.64M
CFFS [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $112.98M. YOTA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $42.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYOTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YOTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFFS and YOTA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YOTA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • YOTA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFS is a better buy in the short-term than YOTA.

Price Growth

CFFS (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while YOTA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFS is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

YOTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.30% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFS($113M) has a higher market cap than YOTA($42.6M). YOTA has higher P/E ratio than CFFS: YOTA (102.90) vs CFFS (78.50). YOTA YTD gains are higher at: 8.889 vs. CFFS (4.472). CFFS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.97M vs. YOTA (-2.38M). YOTA has more cash in the bank: 460K vs. CFFS (25K). YOTA has less debt than CFFS: YOTA (1.27M) vs CFFS (8.46M). CFFS (0) and YOTA (0) have equivalent revenues.
CFFSYOTACFFS / YOTA
Capitalization113M42.6M265%
EBITDA5.97M-2.38M-251%
Gain YTD4.4728.88950%
P/E Ratio78.50102.9076%
Revenue00-
Total Cash25K460K5%
Total Debt8.46M1.27M669%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFSYOTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YOTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSXAX64.33-0.25
-0.39%
NYLI S&P 500 Index Class A
FUFRX24.46-0.11
-0.45%
Franklin Utilities R6
BUIDX33.28-0.20
-0.60%
Buffalo Growth & Income Inst
FERAX10.75-0.09
-0.83%
First Eagle Global Real Assets A
WSCRX36.21-0.41
-1.12%
Allspring Small Company Growth R6

YOTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YOTA has been loosely correlated with GLLIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YOTA jumps, then GLLIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YOTA
1D Price
Change %
YOTA100%
N/A
GLLIU - YOTA
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PORT - YOTA
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDST - YOTA
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGAAU - YOTA
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYNOU - YOTA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More