Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ECAZX
CFMOX vs ECAZX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ECAZX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.19M
Eaton Vance AZ Municipal Income C
Price$9.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.26M
CFMOX vs ECAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ECAZX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ECAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. ECAZX (91.3M). ECAZX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ECAZX (2.57) vs CFMOX (2.27). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ECAZX: CFMOX (30 years) vs ECAZX (20 years). ECAZX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). ECAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ECAZX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.77 vs. ECAZX (-0.55). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. ECAZX (-4.85).
| CFMOX | ECAZX | CFMOX / ECAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.48 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.151 | -1.584 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 91.3M | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 2.57 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | -0.55 | -320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.59 | 2.87 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | -4.85 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.95 | -0.31 | -4,550% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers