Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ETAZX
CFMOX vs ETAZX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ETAZX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.19M
Eaton Vance AZ Municipal Income A
Price$8.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.26M
CFMOX vs ETAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ETAZX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ETAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. ETAZX (91.3M). ETAZX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ETAZX (3.34) vs CFMOX (2.27). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ETAZX: CFMOX (30 years) vs ETAZX (32 years). ETAZX (0.73) and CFMOX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . ETAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ETAZX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.77 vs. ETAZX (-0.07). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. ETAZX (-2.46).
| CFMOX | ETAZX | CFMOX / ETAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.151 | -1.572 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 91.3M | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 3.34 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | -0.07 | -2,423% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.59 | 4.56 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | -2.46 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.95 | 3.02 | 461% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement