Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ETMDX
CFMOX vs ETMDX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ETMDX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.14
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.48M
Eaton Vance MD Municipal Income A
Price$8.05
Change-$0.04 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.4M
CFMOX vs ETMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ETMDX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ETMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. ETMDX (89.4M). ETMDX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ETMDX (3.17) vs CFMOX (2.45). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ETMDX: CFMOX (30 years) vs ETMDX (31 years). ETMDX (0.73) and CFMOX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . ETMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ETMDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.33 vs. ETMDX (0.79). ETMDX return over 5 years is better than : -0.30 vs. CFMOX (-1.22).
| CFMOX | ETMDX | CFMOX / ETMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.73 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.505 | -1.510 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 89.4M | 257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.17 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.33 | 0.79 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.48 | 6.10 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.22 | -0.30 | 403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.09 | 1.05 | 1,250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement