Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs VNDFX
CFMOX vs VNDFX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs VNDFX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.49M
Viking Tax-Free for North Dakota A
Price$8.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.92M
CFMOX vs VNDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. VNDFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and VNDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. VNDFX (16.9M). VNDFX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: VNDFX (3.20) vs CFMOX (2.49). CFMOX was incepted earlier than VNDFX: CFMOX (30 years) vs VNDFX (26 years). VNDFX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). VNDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.91 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and VNDFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.83 vs. VNDFX (-1.79). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -0.34 vs. VNDFX (-7.27).
| CFMOX | VNDFX | CFMOX / VNDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.98 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.30 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.431 | -1.759 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 16.9M | 1,355% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 3.20 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.83 | -1.79 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.88 | -1.26 | -465% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.34 | -7.27 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.03 | 3.64 | 386% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement