Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs WWTCX
CFMOX vs WWTCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs WWTCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.19M
Allspring Wisconsin Tax-Free C
Price$10.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.54M
CFMOX vs WWTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. WWTCX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and WWTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. WWTCX (131M). CFMOX pays higher dividends than WWTCX: CFMOX (2.27) vs WWTCX (2.11). CFMOX was incepted earlier than WWTCX: CFMOX (30 years) vs WWTCX (23 years). WWTCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). CFMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WWTCX (9.00). CFMOX (1000) and WWTCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.77 vs. WWTCX (1.21). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. WWTCX (-1.82).
| CFMOX | WWTCX | CFMOX / WWTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.45 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.70 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.151 | -0.375 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 131M | 175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 2.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 1.21 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.59 | 4.15 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | -1.82 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.95 | 5.31 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement