Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs WWTFX
CFMOX vs WWTFX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs WWTFX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.76M
Allspring Wisconsin Tax-Free A
Price$10.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130M
CFMOX vs WWTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. WWTFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and WWTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. WWTFX (130M). WWTFX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: WWTFX (2.92) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than WWTFX: CFMOX (30 years) vs WWTFX (17 years). WWTFX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). CFMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WWTFX (9.00). CFMOX (1000) and WWTFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. WWTFX (0.76). WWTFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.39 vs. CFMOX (-1.09).
| CFMOX | WWTFX | CFMOX / WWTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.70 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.95 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.713 | 0.374 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 130M | 176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 2.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 0.76 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.32 | 5.03 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | 0.39 | -284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.06 | 10.69 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement