Ad is loading...
CFNLX vs NMBAX
CFNLX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts CFNLX vs NMBAX
Commerce Natl Tax Free Interm Bd
Price$18.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets349.85M
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.69B
CFNLX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFNLX vs. NMBAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFNLX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.69B vs. CFNLX (350M). NMBAX pays higher dividends than CFNLX: NMBAX (3.04) vs CFNLX (2.63). CFNLX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: CFNLX (30 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX (0.65) and CFNLX (0.63) have similar cost to investors . CFNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). CFNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: CFNLX (1000) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.59 vs. CFNLX (2.26). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.97 vs. CFNLX (1.99).
| CFNLX | NMBAX | CFNLX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.65 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.65 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.478 | 0.656 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 350M | 7.69B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.26 | 2.59 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.16 | 4.72 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.99 | 8.97 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.32 | 13.29 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...