CFPZF
Price
$10.72
Change
+$0.04 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
WFSTF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.02 (+7.41%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
246.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFPZF vs WFSTF

Header iconCFPZF vs WFSTF Comparison
Open Charts CFPZF vs WFSTFBanner chart's image
Canfor
Price$10.72
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
Volume$15.89K
Capitalization1.89B
Western Forest Products
Price$0.29
Change+$0.02 (+7.41%)
Volume$8.65K
Capitalization246.12M
CFPZF vs WFSTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFPZF vs. WFSTF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPZF is a StrongBuy and WFSTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CFPZF: $10.72 vs. WFSTF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: CFPZF and WFSTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFPZF: 13% vs. WFSTF: 65%
Market capitalization -- CFPZF: $1.89B vs. WFSTF: $246.12M
CFPZF [@Forest Products] is valued at $1.89B. WFSTF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $246.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFPZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFSTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFPZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFSTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFSTF is a better buy in the long-term than CFPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFPZF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFSTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFPZF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WFSTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFPZF is a better buy in the short-term than WFSTF.

Price Growth

CFPZF (@Forest Products) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while WFSTF (@Forest Products) price change was -1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFSTF is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-1.23% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFPZF($1.89B) has a higher market cap than WFSTF($246M). WFSTF has higher P/E ratio than CFPZF: WFSTF (51.81) vs CFPZF (23.26). WFSTF YTD gains are higher at: 2.316 vs. CFPZF (1.708). WFSTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 66.8M vs. CFPZF (19.9M). CFPZF has more cash in the bank: 861M vs. WFSTF (2.3M). WFSTF has less debt than CFPZF: WFSTF (49.3M) vs CFPZF (386M). CFPZF has higher revenues than WFSTF: CFPZF (5.87B) vs WFSTF (1.35B).
CFPZFWFSTFCFPZF / WFSTF
Capitalization1.89B246M767%
EBITDA19.9M66.8M30%
Gain YTD1.7082.31674%
P/E Ratio23.2651.8145%
Revenue5.87B1.35B436%
Total Cash861M2.3M37,435%
Total Debt386M49.3M783%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFPZF vs WFSTF: Fundamental Ratings
CFPZF
WFSTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8885
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
9390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5180
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFSTF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPZF (66). This means that WFSTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CFPZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as WFSTF (100). This means that CFPZF’s stock grew similarly to WFSTF’s over the last 12 months.

WFSTF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPZF (93). This means that WFSTF’s stock grew similarly to CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CFPZF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as WFSTF (80). This means that CFPZF’s stock grew similarly to WFSTF’s over the last 12 months.

WFSTF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPZF (2). This means that WFSTF’s stock grew similarly to CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFPZFWFSTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTCEX28.550.22
+0.78%
Glenmede Strategic Equity
RSQCX13.450.05
+0.37%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
APHIX34.390.10
+0.29%
Artisan International Institutional
GIEYX16.47N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds International Eq Instl
RYTSX53.16N/A
N/A
Rydex Transportation A

CFPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFPZF has been loosely correlated with IFSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFPZF jumps, then IFSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPZF
1D Price
Change %
CFPZF100%
+0.35%
IFSPF - CFPZF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
WFG - CFPZF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
UFPI - CFPZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
SSD - CFPZF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
ACAZF - CFPZF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WFSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WFSTF and CFPZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WFSTF and CFPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFSTF
1D Price
Change %
WFSTF100%
+6.73%
CFPZF - WFSTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
WFG - WFSTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
IFSPF - WFSTF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
NWGL - WFSTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMTC - WFSTF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More