Ad is loading...
CFRZX vs FFRHX
CFRZX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFRZX vs. FFRHX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFRZX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. CFRZX (727M). FFRHX (8.13) and CFRZX (8.01) have matching dividends . CFRZX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: CFRZX (15 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). CFRZX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). CFRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFRZX: FFRHX (0) vs CFRZX (2000). CFRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. FFRHX (5.47). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. CFRZX (41.60).
| CFRZX | FFRHX | CFRZX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.73 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.73 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.227 | -0.828 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 727M | 16B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.01 | 8.13 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 5.47 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.83 | 21.03 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.60 | 44.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.77 | 55.04 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers