CFSB
Price
$6.94
Change
+$0.07 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.76M
HWBK
Price
$29.55
Change
+$0.34 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
147.36M
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFSB vs HWBK

Header iconCFSB vs HWBK Comparison
Open Charts CFSB vs HWBKBanner chart's image
CFSB Ban
Price$6.94
Change+$0.07 (+1.02%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization47.76M
Hawthorn Bancshares
Price$29.55
Change+$0.34 (+1.16%)
Volume$9.6K
Capitalization147.36M
CFSB vs HWBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFSB vs. HWBK commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSB is a Hold and HWBK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CFSB: $6.94 vs. HWBK: $29.55)
Brand notoriety: CFSB and HWBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFSB: 50% vs. HWBK: 104%
Market capitalization -- CFSB: $47.76M vs. HWBK: $147.36M
CFSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.76M. HWBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $147.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWBK is a better buy in the long-term than CFSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFSB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFSB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HWBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWBK is a better buy in the short-term than CFSB.

Price Growth

CFSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.06% price change this week, while HWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2023.

HWBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWBK($147M) has a higher market cap than CFSB($47.8M). HWBK has higher P/E ratio than CFSB: HWBK (149.93) vs CFSB (127.33). HWBK YTD gains are higher at: 4.233 vs. CFSB (2.664). CFSB has less debt than HWBK: CFSB (20M) vs HWBK (158M). HWBK has higher revenues than CFSB: HWBK (55.1M) vs CFSB (8.14M).
CFSBHWBKCFSB / HWBK
Capitalization47.8M147M33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.6644.23363%
P/E Ratio127.33149.9385%
Revenue8.14M55.1M15%
Total CashN/A17.8M-
Total Debt20M158M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWBK: Fundamental Ratings
HWBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFSBHWBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QDVSX17.270.14
+0.82%
Fisher IIG ESG Stck for Ret Plns
SAGYX136.090.90
+0.67%
ClearBridge Growth I
CLFFX19.870.10
+0.51%
Clifford Capital Partners Investor
GIEZX13.960.06
+0.43%
GuideStone Funds International Eq Inv
GUBGX15.040.04
+0.27%
Victory RS International A

CFSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFSB has been loosely correlated with BPRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFSB jumps, then BPRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFSB
1D Price
Change %
CFSB100%
+1.02%
BPRN - CFSB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
ZION - CFSB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
SBT - CFSB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
FVCB - CFSB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
INBK - CFSB
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More

HWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWBK and FHN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWBK and FHN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWBK
1D Price
Change %
HWBK100%
+1.16%
FHN - HWBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
CHMG - HWBK
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
NSTS - HWBK
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CFSB - HWBK
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
EQBK - HWBK
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
More