Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VMVAX
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VMVAX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.40
Change-$0.17 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets979.87M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$86.60
Change-$0.55 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.57B
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VMVAX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. CFSMX (980M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VMVAX (2.26) vs CFSMX (0.55). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VMVAX (3000) vs CFSMX (100000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.09 vs. CFSMX (-0.91). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 76.94 vs. CFSMX (17.21).
| CFSMX | VMVAX | CFSMX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.07 | 1,214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.543 | 3.430 | -191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 3000 | 3,333,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 30.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 2.26 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.91 | 9.09 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.32 | 29.14 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.21 | 76.94 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement