CGBD
Price
$18.46
Change
+$0.09 (+0.49%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
826.94M
43 days until earnings call
SII
Price
$41.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
964.89M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGBD vs SII

Header iconCGBD vs SII Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs SIIBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$18.46
Change+$0.09 (+0.49%)
Volume$256.34K
Capitalization826.94M
Sprott
Price$41.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$96.11K
Capitalization964.89M
CGBD vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. SII commentary
Jan 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 21, 2025
Stock price -- (CGBD: $18.46 vs. SII: $41.96)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 121% vs. SII: 108%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $826.94M vs. SII: $964.89M
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $826.94M. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than SII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

SII is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SII($965M) has a higher market cap than CGBD($827M). SII has higher P/E ratio than CGBD: SII (23.24) vs CGBD (9.82). CGBD YTD gains are higher at: 2.956 vs. SII (-0.498). SII (22.9M) and CGBD (22.7M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SII has less debt than CGBD: SII (24.2M) vs CGBD (979M). SII has higher revenues than CGBD: SII (141M) vs CGBD (101M).
CGBDSIICGBD / SII
Capitalization827M965M86%
EBITDAN/A57.2M-
Gain YTD2.956-0.498-594%
P/E Ratio9.8223.2442%
Revenue101M141M72%
Total Cash22.7M22.9M99%
Total Debt979M24.2M4,045%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1136
SMR RATING
1..100
2656
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6261
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGBD's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (34). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (36). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (56). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (55). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (62). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
31%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSHCX35.260.44
+1.26%
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
OALGX21.150.25
+1.20%
Optimum Large Cap Growth A
ICSFX29.690.21
+0.71%
Invesco Comstock R6
WLCAX13.660.07
+0.52%
Allspring Large Company Value A
LEISX22.700.09
+0.40%
Federated Hermes Equity Income IS