Ad is loading...
CGBL vs GDMA
CGBL vs GDMA Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs GDMA
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$32.12
Change-$0.33 (-1.02%)
Volume$460.97K
Net Assets1.75B
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$32.48
Change-$0.27 (-0.82%)
Volume$5.64K
Net Assets156.81M
CGBL vs GDMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GDMA commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and GDMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.75B vs. GDMA (157M). CGBL (2.718) and GDMA (2.695) have matching annual dividend yield . CGBL was incepted earlier than GDMA: CGBL (1 year) vs GDMA (6 years). GDMA has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | GDMA | CGBL / GDMA | |
| Gain YTD | 2.718 | 2.695 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 157M | 1,117% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 219.00 | 1% |
| Yield | N/A | 4.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.98% | ||
More | ||||
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | -5.74% | ||
| GOLD - GDMA | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.76% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
More | ||||