Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CGBL vs GDMA
CGBL vs GDMA Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs GDMA
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$31.16
Change-$0.30 (-0.95%)
Volume$364.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$32.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
Volume$602
CapitalizationN/A
CGBL vs GDMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GDMA commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a StrongSell and GDMA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.15B vs. GDMA (154M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GDMA: CGBL (15.480) vs GDMA (8.103). CGBL was incepted earlier than GDMA: CGBL (1 year) vs GDMA (6 years). GDMA has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | GDMA | CGBL / GDMA | |
| Gain YTD | 15.480 | 8.103 | 191% |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 154M | 745% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 219.00 | 1% |
| Yield | N/A | 4.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 10 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 10 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 10 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 18 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 10 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBPTX | 47.59 | -0.09 | -0.19% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Tr | |||
| AGYCX | 11.58 | -0.04 | -0.34% |
| American Century Global Gold C | |||
| FRMCX | 32.08 | -0.27 | -0.83% |
| Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val A | |||
| AIOOX | 15.37 | -0.13 | -0.84% |
| Aristotle/Saul Global Equity I-2 | |||
| ALGYX | 79.75 | -1.46 | -1.80% |
| Alger Focus Equity Y | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 64% Loosely correlated | -9.20% | ||
| ASML - CGBL | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| GOLD - GDMA | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.67% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||