Ad is loading...
CGBL vs GDMA
CGBL vs GDMA Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs GDMA
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$29.61
Change-$0.71 (-2.34%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets1.72B
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Price$30.87
Change-$0.18 (-0.58%)
Volume$1.42K
Net Assets110.6M
CGBL vs GDMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GDMA commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and GDMA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.72B vs. GDMA (111M). GDMA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: GDMA (-1.818) vs CGBL (-2.683). CGBL was incepted earlier than GDMA: CGBL (2 years) vs GDMA (6 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than GDMA (0.80). GDMA has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | GDMA | CGBL / GDMA | |
| Gain YTD | -2.683 | -1.818 | 148% |
| Net Assets | 1.72B | 111M | 1,552% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.80 | 41% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 542.00 | 1% |
| Yield | 2.00 | 2.29 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +5.79% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +14.40% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +15.55% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +16.34% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +16.88% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | +18.66% | ||
More | ||||
GDMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GDMA and NEM have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GDMA and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDMA | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| NEM - GDMA | 16% Poorly correlated | +8.43% | ||
| GOLD - GDMA | 12% Poorly correlated | +7.31% | ||
| LMT - GDMA | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.26% | ||
| AEE - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
| NOC - GDMA | 10% Poorly correlated | +4.13% | ||
More | ||||