Ad is loading...
CGBL vs MPAY
CGBL vs MPAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MPAY commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and MPAY is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.06B vs. MPAY (2.17M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MPAY: CGBL (0.335) vs MPAY (-3.694). CGBL was incepted earlier than MPAY: CGBL (2 years) vs MPAY (3 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MPAY (0.59). MPAY has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MPAY | CGBL / MPAY | |
| Gain YTD | 0.335 | -3.694 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 2.17M | 94,618% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.59 | 56% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 601.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 2.00 | 7.15 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XNO.X | 0.974243 | 0.120707 | +14.14% |
| Nano cryptocurrency | |||
| FIO.X | 0.017277 | 0.001671 | +10.71% |
| FIO Protocol cryptocurrency | |||
| RIF.X | 0.050297 | 0.004400 | +9.59% |
| Rootstock Infrastructure Framework cryptocurrency | |||
| KAVA.X | 0.470838 | 0.035491 | +8.15% |
| Kava cryptocurrency | |||
| TCT.X | 0.000453 | 0.000020 | +4.55% |
| TokenClub cryptocurrency | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 72% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
More | ||||
MPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPAY has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPAY jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPAY | 100% | N/A | ||
| NVDA - MPAY | 72% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| LRCX - MPAY | 72% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| QCOM - MPAY | 72% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| KLAC - MPAY | 72% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| CDNS - MPAY | 71% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||