Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MPAY
CGBL vs MPAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MPAY commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a StrongBuy and MPAY is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.31B vs. MPAY (2.17M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MPAY: CGBL (4.702) vs MPAY (-3.694). CGBL was incepted earlier than MPAY: CGBL (2 years) vs MPAY (3 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MPAY (0.59). MPAY has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MPAY | CGBL / MPAY | |
| Gain YTD | 4.702 | -3.694 | -127% |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 2.17M | 106,026% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.59 | 56% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 601.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 1.92 | 7.15 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XEC.X | 0.000021 | N/A | +2.11% |
| eCash cryptocurrency | |||
| SXP.X | 0.174091 | 0.002485 | +1.45% |
| Solar cryptocurrency | |||
| OGN.X | 0.054322 | 0.000761 | +1.42% |
| Origin Protocol cryptocurrency | |||
| HIFI.X | 0.073571 | -0.002037 | -2.69% |
| Hifi Finance cryptocurrency | |||
| ANY.X | 2.143045 | -0.231598 | -9.75% |
| Anyswap cryptocurrency | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.43% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 74% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||
MPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPAY has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPAY jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPAY | 100% | N/A | ||
| NVDA - MPAY | 73% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| QCOM - MPAY | 71% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| LRCX - MPAY | 71% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| KLAC - MPAY | 70% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| CDNS - MPAY | 69% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||