Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MPRO
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MPRO
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$32.60
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
Volume$1.81K
Net Assets2.3B
Monarch ProCap ETF
Price$29.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$7.76K
Net Assets242.34M
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MPRO commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a StrongBuy and MPRO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.31B vs. MPRO (242M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MPRO: CGBL (4.477) vs MPRO (2.370). CGBL was incepted earlier than MPRO: CGBL (2 years) vs MPRO (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MPRO (1.14). MPRO has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MPRO | CGBL / MPRO | |
| Gain YTD | 4.477 | 2.370 | 189% |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 242M | 952% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.14 | 29% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 118.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.92 | 1.64 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 19 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 55% | 17 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 17 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 74% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||