CGC
Price
$2.87
Change
+$0.13 (+4.74%)
Updated
Jan 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
35 days until earnings call
GTBIF
Price
$8.17
Change
+$0.19 (+2.38%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

CGC vs GTBIF

Header iconCGC vs GTBIF Comparison
Open Charts CGC vs GTBIFBanner chart's image
Canopy Growth
Price$2.87
Change+$0.13 (+4.74%)
Volume$50.02K
CapitalizationN/A
Green Thumb Industries
Price$8.17
Change+$0.19 (+2.38%)
Volume$784.06K
CapitalizationN/A
CGC vs GTBIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGC vs. GTBIF commentary
Jan 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGC is a Hold and GTBIF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CGC: $2.74 vs. GTBIF: $8.17)
Brand notoriety: CGC: Notable vs. GTBIF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGC: 78% vs. GTBIF: 145%
Market capitalization -- CGC: $784.64M vs. GTBIF: $1.68B
CGC [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $784.64M. GTBIF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CGC and GTBIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTBIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CGC and GTBIF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CGC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +60.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.23% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTBIF($1.68B) has a higher market cap than CGC($785M). CGC (0.000) and GTBIF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . GTBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253M vs. CGC (-1.02B). CGC (186M) and GTBIF (185M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GTBIF has less debt than CGC: GTBIF (541M) vs CGC (693M). GTBIF has higher revenues than CGC: GTBIF (1.02B) vs CGC (362M).
CGCGTBIFCGC / GTBIF
Capitalization785M1.68B47%
EBITDA-1.02B253M-404%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/A172.41-
Revenue362M1.02B35%
Total Cash186M185M101%
Total Debt693M541M128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGC vs GTBIF: Fundamental Ratings
CGC
GTBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9885
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9485
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTBIF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CGC (80) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CGC’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CGC (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CGC’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CGC (98) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CGC’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's Price Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CGC (94) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CGC’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CGC (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGCGTBIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAIIX15.25N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Instl
STRGX57.75N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital MdCp Relatv Val Instl
SVYAX11.17N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility A (SIIT)
HFYTX9.97N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
PMIRX10.60N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income R

GTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBIF
1D Price
Change %
GTBIF100%
N/A
TCNNF - GTBIF
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
CURLF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
VRNOF - GTBIF
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
TSNDF - GTBIF
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
CRLBF - GTBIF
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
More