CGEN vs EDIT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGEN is a StrongBuy and EDIT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEDIT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CGEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EDIT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CGEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDIT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CGEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EDIT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CGEN (@Biotechnology) experienced а +9.03% price change this week, while EDIT (@Biotechnology) price change was +5.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
CGEN is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
EDIT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+4.45% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| CGEN | EDIT | CGEN / EDIT | |
| Capitalization | 134M | 130M | 103% |
| EBITDA | -14.41M | -233.11M | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 2.614 | 29.921 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.00 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 27.9M | 32.3M | 86% |
| Total Cash | 103M | 270M | 38% |
| Total Debt | 2.91M | 35M | 8% |
CGEN | EDIT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EDIT's Valuation (22) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CGEN (78). This means that EDIT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CGEN’s over the last 12 months.
EDIT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CGEN (100). This means that EDIT’s stock grew similarly to CGEN’s over the last 12 months.
CGEN's SMR Rating (92) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as EDIT (95). This means that CGEN’s stock grew similarly to EDIT’s over the last 12 months.
EDIT's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CGEN (85). This means that EDIT’s stock grew similarly to CGEN’s over the last 12 months.
CGEN's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for EDIT (100). This means that CGEN’s stock grew significantly faster than EDIT’s over the last 12 months.
| CGEN | EDIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 23 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
CGEN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGEN has been loosely correlated with NURPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGEN jumps, then NURPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGEN | 100% | +12.14% | ||
| NURPF - CGEN | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASPHF - CGEN | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ORMP - CGEN | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| BDTX - CGEN | 37% Loosely correlated | +5.94% | ||
| BPMC - CGEN | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||
EDIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDIT has been loosely correlated with CRSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDIT jumps, then CRSP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EDIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDIT | 100% | +6.45% | ||
| CRSP - EDIT | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.40% | ||
| AXON - EDIT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| PRME - EDIT | 51% Loosely correlated | +8.13% | ||
| VCYT - EDIT | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| NTLA - EDIT | 49% Loosely correlated | +7.93% | ||
More | ||||