Ad is loading...
CGFAX vs JHCPX
CGFAX vs JHCPX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs JHCPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$65.70
Change-$3.92 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
JHFunds2 Capital Appreciation NAV
Price$13.27
Change-$0.81 (-5.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.8M
CGFAX vs JHCPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. JHCPX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Hold and JHCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. JHCPX (889M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than JHCPX: CGFAX (0.39) vs JHCPX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than JHCPX: CGFAX (23 years) vs JHCPX (19 years). JHCPX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). JHCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). JHCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: JHCPX (0) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.10 vs. JHCPX (-10.20). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. JHCPX (6.75).
| CGFAX | JHCPX | CGFAX / JHCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.74 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.75 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.839 | -8.274 | 58% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 889M | 31,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.10 | -10.20 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.33 | -7.79 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 6.75 | 1,062% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.93 | -22.70 | -286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers