Ad is loading...
CGFAX vs TGWFX
CGFAX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs TGWFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$66.00
Change+$1.04 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Transamerica Large Growth R4
Price$11.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.6M
CGFAX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs. TGWFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and TGWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. TGWFX (291M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than TGWFX: CGFAX (0.39) vs TGWFX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: CGFAX (23 years) vs TGWFX (25 years). TGWFX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: CGFAX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.35 vs. TGWFX (-10.86). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. TGWFX (2.37).
| CGFAX | TGWFX | CGFAX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.96 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.787 | -14.590 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 291M | 89,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.35 | -10.86 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.97 | -4.18 | -167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.63 | 2.37 | 2,011% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.53 | 26.60 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...