Ad is loading...
CGFYX vs GFAFX
CGFYX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs GFAFX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$71.71
Change+$0.40 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.41B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
CGFYX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. CGFYX (5.41B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than CGFYX: GFAFX (0.35) vs CGFYX (0.00). CGFYX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CGFYX (16 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) and CGFYX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: GFAFX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). CGFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. GFAFX (3.57). CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 52.08 vs. GFAFX (44.32).
| CGFYX | GFAFX | CGFYX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.67 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.67 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.773 | -2.440 | 319% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.41B | 284B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | 3.57 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.09 | 34.10 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.08 | 44.32 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.53 | 61.32 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...