Ad is loading...
CGFYX vs RGABX
CGFYX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts CGFYX vs RGABX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst3
Price$71.71
Change+$0.40 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.41B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
CGFYX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFYX vs. RGABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFYX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. CGFYX (5.41B). CGFYX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . CGFYX was incepted earlier than RGABX: CGFYX (16 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CGFYX (0.66). CGFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFYX: RGABX (250) vs CGFYX (1000000). CGFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.76 vs. RGABX (1.96). CGFYX return over 5 years is better than : 51.91 vs. RGABX (36.12).
| CGFYX | RGABX | CGFYX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.876 | -2.695 | 292% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.41B | 284B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | 1.96 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 29.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.91 | 36.12 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.66 | 48.37 | 185% |