CGGO vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGO is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CGGO | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 85% | 26 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IAI | 152.77 | 3.33 | +2.23% |
| iShares US Broker-Dealers&Secs Exchs ETF | |||
| MSTB | 34.25 | 0.30 | +0.88% |
| LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF | |||
| NUBD | 22.24 | 0.09 | +0.41% |
| Nuveen ESG US Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| XFIX | 52.23 | 0.13 | +0.25% |
| F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | |||
| XYLE | 25.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X S&P 500 ESG Covered Call ETF | |||
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| ASML - CGGO | 81% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 75% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| SNPS - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| CPRT - CGGO | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MSFT - CGGO | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.39% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||