Advertisement
CGGR vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGR is a Hold and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CGGR | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXU | 73.00 | 2.06 | +2.90% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN | |||
| SELV | 31.01 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| SEI Enhanced Low Volatil US Lg Cap ETF | |||
| MFUL | 21.93 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Mindful Conservative ETF | |||
| SPBW | 26.32 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF | |||
| IJJ | 127.21 | -0.30 | -0.24% |
| iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | |||
CGGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGR has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGR jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| SNPS - CGGR | 73% Closely correlated | +7.29% | ||
| ASML - CGGR | 73% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| AMZN - CGGR | 70% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| AMAT - CGGR | 70% Closely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| TSM - CGGR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | +7.29% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | +9.74% | ||
| S - SNPS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ROP - SNPS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||