CGGR vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGGR is a Hold and SNPS is a Hold.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CGGR | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 18 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JETD | 12.62 | 1.11 | +9.67% |
| MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | |||
| KSTR | 14.92 | 0.95 | +6.80% |
| KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 ETF | |||
| PZT | 22.97 | 0.08 | +0.35% |
| Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF | |||
| PHO | 66.28 | -0.96 | -1.43% |
| Invesco Water Resources ETF | |||
| FCG | 25.06 | -0.87 | -3.36% |
| First Trust Natural Gas ETF | |||
CGGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGR has been closely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGR jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGR | 100% | -2.62% | ||
| SNPS - CGGR | 73% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| ASML - CGGR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| AMZN - CGGR | 70% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| AMAT - CGGR | 70% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| TSM - CGGR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -3.87% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 87% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 83% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -8.05% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
More | ||||