Ad is loading...
CGIIX vs FCSDX
CGIIX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts CGIIX vs FCSDX
Calamos Growth & Income I
Price$44.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.75B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$16.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
CGIIX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIIX vs. FCSDX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIIX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. CGIIX (2.75B). FCSDX pays higher dividends than CGIIX: FCSDX (1.50) vs CGIIX (0.95). CGIIX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: CGIIX (28 years) vs FCSDX (21 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CGIIX (0.80). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGIIX (28.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIIX: FCSDX (0) vs CGIIX (1000000). CGIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.69 vs. FCSDX (3.69). CGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.25 vs. FCSDX (30.32).
| CGIIX | FCSDX | CGIIX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.758 | 0.358 | -771% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 5.03B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.50 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 3.69 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 11.19 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.25 | 30.32 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.49 | 27.94 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...