Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIIX vs FCSDX
CGIIX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts CGIIX vs FCSDX
Calamos Growth & Income I
Price$50.33
Change+$0.17 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.05B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc C
Price$17.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
CGIIX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIIX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIIX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. CGIIX (3.05B). FCSDX pays higher dividends than CGIIX: FCSDX (1.44) vs CGIIX (0.85). CGIIX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: CGIIX (28 years) vs FCSDX (22 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than CGIIX (0.80). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGIIX (28.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIIX: FCSDX (0) vs CGIIX (1000000). CGIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. FCSDX (7.62). CGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 53.34 vs. FCSDX (29.33).
| CGIIX | FCSDX | CGIIX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.67 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.473 | 6.612 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 5.21B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.44 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 7.62 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 18.11 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.34 | 29.33 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | 38.41 | 234% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement