Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIIX vs FTSDX
CGIIX vs FTSDX Comparison
Open Charts CGIIX vs FTSDX
Calamos Growth & Income I
Price$47.20
Change-$0.48 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.12
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.13B
CGIIX vs FTSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIIX vs. FTSDX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIIX is a Buy and FTSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. CGIIX (2.92B). FTSDX pays higher dividends than CGIIX: FTSDX (1.99) vs CGIIX (0.90). CGIIX was incepted earlier than FTSDX: CGIIX (28 years) vs FTSDX (21 years). FTSDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CGIIX (0.80). FTSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGIIX (28.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIIX: FTSDX (0) vs CGIIX (1000000). FTSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. CGIIX (6.33). CGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.43 vs. FTSDX (34.61).
| CGIIX | FTSDX | CGIIX / FTSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.520 | 3.923 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.92B | 5.13B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.99 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 7.42 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.87 | 22.12 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.43 | 34.61 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.61 | 38.06 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers