Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGIIX vs FTSDX
CGIIX vs FTSDX Comparison
Open Charts CGIIX vs FTSDX
Calamos Growth & Income I
Price$50.33
Change+$0.17 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.05B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$17.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.21B
CGIIX vs FTSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIIX vs. FTSDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIIX is a Buy and FTSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.21B vs. CGIIX (3.05B). FTSDX pays higher dividends than CGIIX: FTSDX (1.95) vs CGIIX (0.85). CGIIX was incepted earlier than FTSDX: CGIIX (28 years) vs FTSDX (22 years). FTSDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CGIIX (0.80). FTSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGIIX (28.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIIX: FTSDX (0) vs CGIIX (1000000). CGIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. FTSDX (8.11). CGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 53.34 vs. FTSDX (32.64).
| CGIIX | FTSDX | CGIIX / FTSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.473 | 6.878 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 5.21B | 59% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.95 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 8.11 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 19.92 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.34 | 32.64 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | 43.38 | 207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement