Ad is loading...
CGIIX vs FTSDX
CGIIX vs FTSDX Comparison
Open Charts CGIIX vs FTSDX
Calamos Growth & Income I
Price$44.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.75B
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc M
Price$16.71
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
CGIIX vs FTSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGIIX vs. FTSDX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGIIX is a Buy and FTSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. CGIIX (2.75B). FTSDX pays higher dividends than CGIIX: FTSDX (2.04) vs CGIIX (0.95). CGIIX was incepted earlier than FTSDX: CGIIX (28 years) vs FTSDX (21 years). FTSDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CGIIX (0.80). FTSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CGIIX (28.00). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGIIX: FTSDX (0) vs CGIIX (1000000). CGIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.69 vs. FTSDX (4.19). CGIIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.25 vs. FTSDX (33.74).
| CGIIX | FTSDX | CGIIX / FTSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.758 | 0.491 | -562% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 5.03B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 2.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | 4.19 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.53 | 12.85 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.25 | 33.74 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.49 | 32.39 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers