CGKEF vs CLMOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGKEF is a Hold and CLMOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CGKEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLMOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CGKEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CLMOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CGKEF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLMOF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (+3.79% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
| CGKEF | CLMOF | CGKEF / CLMOF | |
| Capitalization | 2.53B | 20.2M | 12,500% |
| EBITDA | -226.06B | -39.16M | 577,268% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 270.27 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.55T | 8.39M | 18,503,515% |
| Total Cash | 200B | 222M | 90,090% |
| Total Debt | 2.78T | 103M | 2,697,087% |
CGKEF | CLMOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGKEF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLMOF (76). This means that CGKEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.
CGKEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMOF (100). This means that CGKEF’s stock grew similarly to CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.
CLMOF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CGKEF (100). This means that CLMOF’s stock grew similarly to CGKEF’s over the last 12 months.
CGKEF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMOF (79). This means that CGKEF’s stock grew similarly to CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.
CGKEF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLMOF (100). This means that CGKEF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLMOF’s over the last 12 months.
| CLMOF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 8% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 5% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MDVWX | 7.89 | 0.06 | +0.77% |
| Manning & Napier Disciplined Value W | |||
| PAGSX | 63.77 | 0.38 | +0.60% |
| T. Rowe Price Global Stock Adv | |||
| MEGMX | 13.05 | 0.07 | +0.54% |
| Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Inv | |||
| WPVIX | 34.19 | 0.15 | +0.44% |
| Weitz Multi Cap Equity-Institutional Cl | |||
| HCMZX | 18.99 | 0.06 | +0.32% |
| HCM Dividend Sector Plus R | |||
CGKEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGKEF has been loosely correlated with KAEPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGKEF jumps, then KAEPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGKEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGKEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KAEPF - CGKEF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TREAY - CGKEF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLPXF - CGKEF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AWSL - CGKEF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CWPWF - CGKEF | 0% Poorly correlated | -6.67% | ||
More | ||||
CLMOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLMOF and ADN have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLMOF and ADN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLMOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLMOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADN - CLMOF | 1% Poorly correlated | +4.04% | ||
| CGKEF - CLMOF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BRLXF - CLMOF | 0% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| CLPXF - CLMOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CWPWF - CLMOF | -0% Poorly correlated | -6.67% | ||
More | ||||