CGMLF
Price
$0.74
Change
-$0.06 (-7.50%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.55B
SYAXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
Ad is loading...

CGMLF vs SYAXF

Header iconCGMLF vs SYAXF Comparison
Open Charts CGMLF vs SYAXFBanner chart's image
Chalice Mining
Price$0.74
Change-$0.06 (-7.50%)
Volume$703
Capitalization1.55B
Sayona Mining
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$488.34K
Capitalization1.06B
CGMLF vs SYAXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SYAXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGMLF vs. SYAXF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGMLF is a Hold and SYAXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CGMLF: $0.74 vs. SYAXF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: CGMLF and SYAXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGMLF: 11% vs. SYAXF: 49%
Market capitalization -- CGMLF: $1.55B vs. SYAXF: $1.06B
CGMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.55B. SYAXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSYAXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SYAXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYAXF is a better buy in the long-term than CGMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYAXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SYAXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGMLF is a better buy in the short-term than SYAXF.

Price Growth

CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.81% price change this week, while SYAXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGMLF($1.55B) has a higher market cap than SYAXF($1.06B). CGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 16.535 vs. SYAXF (-10.313). SYAXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.27M vs. CGMLF (-70.16M). CGMLF has more cash in the bank: 115M vs. SYAXF (493K). SYAXF has less debt than CGMLF: SYAXF (89.1K) vs CGMLF (349K). CGMLF has higher revenues than SYAXF: CGMLF (125K) vs SYAXF (20.7K).
CGMLFSYAXFCGMLF / SYAXF
Capitalization1.55B1.06B146%
EBITDA-70.16M-1.27M5,532%
Gain YTD16.535-10.313-160%
P/E RatioN/A26.81-
Revenue125K20.7K604%
Total Cash115M493K23,327%
Total Debt349K89.1K392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGMLF vs SYAXF: Fundamental Ratings
CGMLF
SYAXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8695
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6391
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SYAXF's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (95). This means that SYAXF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SYAXF (95). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to SYAXF’s over the last 12 months.

SYAXF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (97). This means that SYAXF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CGMLF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SYAXF (91). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to SYAXF’s over the last 12 months.

SYAXF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGMLF (100). This means that SYAXF’s stock grew significantly faster than CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGMLFSYAXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SYAXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEUCX19.560.18
+0.93%
Fidelity Advisor Glbl Capital Apprec C
GTILX27.860.22
+0.80%
Glenmede Quant US Large Cap Gr Eq Instl
GLEIX14.790.09
+0.61%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares
RYMKX57.910.34
+0.59%
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy H
FASIX13.630.03
+0.22%
Fidelity Asset Manager 20%

CGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and NAK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and NAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGMLF
1D Price
Change %
CGMLF100%
N/A
NAK - CGMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
CVVUF - CGMLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.96%
PMETF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
SYAXF - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.33%
GLNCY - CGMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More

SYAXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SYAXF and PMETF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SYAXF and PMETF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYAXF
1D Price
Change %
SYAXF100%
-4.33%
PMETF - SYAXF
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
GLCNF - SYAXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
PLL - SYAXF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
BDNNY - SYAXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
GLNCY - SYAXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
More